Corrado Malanga: rompe il silenzio e pubblica tutto, “ora non possono più dire che è falso”

Corrado Malanga is an Italian researcher, author, and popularizer known for his extensive work on abductions, regressive hypnosis, and consciousness. Over the years, he has built a significant portion of his public career around the study of testimonies, case studies, and the analysis of stories that emerged during hypnotic sessions. In this talk, he returns to one of the most discussed cases of his research: that of Valerio Lonzi. In this video, Malanga explains why he decided to make public, after many years, the hypnosis sessions he conducted between 1995 and 1996. The focus is not only on the content of the sessions, but also on the conflict that emerged over time: on the one hand, his reconstruction of the case; on the other, Valerio Lonzi's subsequent statements, which today dispute the meaning of those experiences and cast doubt on the work he did then. It is precisely from this fracture that the video arises: a direct, forceful, and straightforward stance. Why watch it today? Because this isn't your typical video about aliens or ufology for entertainment. Memory, hypnosis, testimony, credibility, method, public conflict, and the defense of decades-long research intertwine. Malanga doesn't simply recount a case: he tries to explain why, in his opinion, the full publication of the recordings is the only way to quell accusations, doubts, and opposing reconstructions. This talk is aimed at those who have followed Corrado Malanga for years, those interested in regressive hypnosis, ufology, consciousness, anomalous phenomena, and the psychology of testimony, but also those who want to understand how controversy arises around a landmark case. It's an important video even for skeptics, because it shows the context, the protagonists, the technical limitations of the time, and how the research has evolved over time. Watching it, you'll better understand: why Valerio Lonzi's hypnosis is only now being made public; what method was used in the 1990s; What does Malanga argue today about the differences between those early techniques and the systems developed in subsequent decades? Why has the relationship between researcher, witness, and memory become so controversial? And what aspects of the case do Malanga consider crucial to the credibility of the original account? The video addresses uncomfortable and central questions: how valuable is a testimony if the protagonist later denies it or claims not to remember? How much weight does the hypnotic context have? What happens when years of research is accused of being false, manipulated, or carried out for financial gain? And above all: is it possible to distinguish between lived experience, the researcher's interpretation, and the transformation of memory over time? One of the video's strongest aspects is its tone: personal, polemical, defensive, but also historical. Malanga reconstructs the names, presences, recordings, the role of the hypnologist Moretti, the editorial changes in the book, and the evolution of his theory of abductions. He doesn't just present a story, but a genuine public self-defense of his position, arguing that publishing the hypnosis will allow listeners to judge for themselves. Timestamps / Chapters 00:00 Why Corrado Malanga is now publishing Valerio Lonzi's hypnosis 00:44 The accusations of business, deception, and manipulation of the case 02:27 The tapes, the witnesses present, and the crux of memory 03:21 "I didn't do it for the money": Malanga's public defense 04:16 The book, Roberto Pinotti, and the later disavowed preface 05:16 The TV appearances and the defense of the Valerio Lonzi case 06:46 Why, according to Malanga, the public must now listen to everything 07:17 The unfinished abductions and the concept of "repeaters" 08:15 The three parasitic entities: the current interpretation of the case 08:49 From the slow hypnosis of the 1990s to the methods developed afterward 09:33 Why the journey with Valerio Lonzi remains incomplete 10:15 "The aliens profit from it": the Most controversial passage 11:10 How the removal of memories between sessions worked 12:16 The post-hypnotic order that, according to Malanga, didn't work 13:20 CHIAP, TV, and public attacks on abduction research 14:15 The 3,500 subsequent cases and the comparison with the first major case 15:26 Publishing everything to answer the accusations once and for all 16:14 Exogamous sexual intercourse and the parallels with other historical cases 17:34 The original unedited tapes and the real noises in the room 18:26 The last hypnosis filmed with the Rai 3 crew 20:04 How much of the phenomenon was really understood in the 1990s 21:16 Why Malanga is returning today to a topic he said he had abandoned 22:27 The personal price paid for 40 years of research 23:25 The definitive conclusion: "there was nothing else to do"