JUIZ QUE ERRA: DEVE SER DEMITIDO OU APOSENTADO?

☎️ Talk to me on WhatsApp! https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=5... The Supreme Federal Court (STF) ended mandatory retirement as a punishment. Now the Attorney General's Office (PGR) wants to change that decision. Many people were surprised when the Supreme Federal Court decided to end mandatory paid retirement as punishment for magistrates who commit serious disciplinary infractions. According to the decision of the First Panel of the STF, after the 2019 Pension Reform, this type of punishment no longer has a constitutional basis. Instead of receiving proportional retirement, the magistrate may lose their position, provided that the procedures foreseen for this are observed. BUT NOW THE PGR HAS APPEALED THE DECISION The Attorney General's Office has filed an appeal with the Supreme Federal Court itself. According to the Attorney General's Office (PGR), the decision creates important constitutional problems, such as the competence to decree the loss of office, the preservation of the double degree of jurisdiction, and the protection of the guarantees of the judiciary. In the Attorney General's view, these points need to be reviewed by the Supreme Federal Court (STF) before the understanding is definitively consolidated. WHAT CHANGES FOR JUDGES? At this moment, the discussion is not about common retirement nor about INSS (Brazilian Social Security Institute) retirement. We are talking exclusively about the disciplinary punishment applied to magistrates. Until then, the most serious sanction was compulsory retirement with proportional pay. With the STF's decision, the understanding has become that the appropriate punishment may be the loss of office. Now it will be up to the Supreme Court to analyze the appeal presented by the PGR. THE DECISION MAY STILL UNDERGO CHANGES As there is a pending appeal, the issue is not yet definitively closed. The Supreme Federal Court (STF) may uphold its current understanding or modify some aspect of the decision after analyzing the arguments presented by the Attorney General's Office. Therefore, this is a matter that deserves monitoring in the coming months. WE WILL FOLLOW THIS JUDGMENT This is one of those issues that can have significant repercussions on the disciplinary responsibility of magistrates and on the functioning of the Judiciary itself. As soon as the STF decides on the appeal, we will provide a complete analysis explaining what has changed and what the practical effects will be. 🌐OUR WEBSITE https://bocchiadvogados.com.br 📊RETIREMENT CALCULATOR https://bocchiadvogados.com.br/calcul... 📗E-BOOK CRAZY TO RETIRE https://bocchiadvogados.com.br/loucop... TO PURCHASE THE BOOK: https://pag.ae/7-wR-MLnJ IMPORTANT Our content is aimed at informing the public, especially clients, about their social rights. We ask that you review and read our Privacy Policy on the website.