Gastei tempo demais estudando terrorismo. Esse é o resultado
Terrorism isn't just "people blowing things up." It's a political tool, a strategy of fear, a legal label, a resource of irregular warfare, and often a word used by states to justify stealing more money from you. I discuss terrorism and International Relations based on authors like Charles Townshend, Todd Sandler, Alessandro Visacro, Walter Laqueur, David Rapoport, and Samuel Huntington. The idea is to separate terrorism, guerrilla warfare, insurgency, organized crime, state terror, state sponsorship, and fourth-generation warfare without spouting too much nonsense. We'll talk about how states use this classification, why the War on Terror was a stupid thing, and how violent organizations aren't necessarily stupid. YouTube: This video is an educational and critical analysis. It does not promote, glorify, justify, or teach political violence or attacks against civilians. The goal is to understand how these phenomena are defined, instrumentalized, and used for a lay audience. Nobody reads descriptions, I'll put whatever I want here... on the other hand, the description helps people find the video. Sometimes I wonder if I make them too detailed for no reason. Want to understand why "terrorist" isn't a neutral word, why not all political violence is terrorism, and why propaganda works best when you think you're immune to it? Great. Livepix if you want to help: https://livepix.gg/erick40k Amazon link, helps the channel: https://link.amazon/B05KOyaFO 00:00 - Introduction and apologies 01:05 - Use of euphemisms, a mea culpa 2 01:39 - What is terrorism? 03:08 - Why defining what horrorism is is rubbish and how to use it? 03:53 - Securitization à la Copenhagen School. 05:34 - Securitization and terrorism 06:05 - Whose academic work did I steal? 06:38 - Important questions to guide research 07:27 - Targets and why they are chosen 09:20 - Consequences for governments of securitizing the topic 09:56 - Why is controversy a problem to solve? 10:34 - The stupidest definition and why it's a problem 11:04 - The importance of target selection 12:07 - Practical consequences of an ambiguous definition 13:35 - Terrorism is the brown of politics 14:20 - Exogenous labeling and its problems and limits 14:37 - What does the use of this labeling indicate? 15:16 - Definitions, finally. FINALLY 20:16 - Difference between first-wave and second/third-wave consequences 21:51 - Can States be Terrorists? 29:08 - The problem of exaggerating the importance of state-sponsor terror 29:41 - Why do States do this? 31:21 - Thanks to the channel's patrons 33:43 - Recap 34:18 - If this is bad, why use it? 35:22 - Difference between war and terrorism 36:19 - Sociological effect: disproportionality in effectiveness 37:18 - The problem of classification by action 37:55 - A checklist for the definition? 39:39 - A specific case study 40:16 - A practical and graphic explanation of definitions being instrumentalized 40:49 - Guerrilla warfare and horror 44:19 - Civil war and horror 45:26 - On victims and the alteration of the definition 48:10 - On target selection, horror, and the long tail of consequences and political instrumentalization 55:29 - The operational and political logic of a horrorist organization 01:02:27 - Operational, tactical, and strategic objectives 01:03:02 - Revisiting the problem of gangs and terror for strategic objectives 01:04:08 - Return to operational and political logic 01:05:15 - The incentive game of the government response 01:08:31 - Okay... but does this work? 01:10:29: An overview of tactics, funding, and vision for success 01:16:13 - The problem of the cycle of violence 01:16:38 - Defining an ORGANIZATION, not just the act 01:17:26 - Modification as a response to technological pressure and organizational structure: lone wolves, cells, loners 01:21:45 - Casualties and sensationalism; funding and kidnappings and the changing public perception 01:23:37 - Transnational and domestic horrorism 01:25:29 - Why can't countries cooperate? 01:26:16 - The other way to segment domestic/transnational 01:27:16 - Organizational motivations 01:29:01 - Game theory and rationality 01:31:26 - Who usually joins such an organization? What is their reasoning like? 01:37:42 - Brazil, definitions of terrorism and taxonomic controversies 01:39:54 - Failed states, poverty and consequences 01:40:20 - The last two centuries of this 01:49:47 - Samuel Huntington and the clash of civilizations 01:51:20 - The four generations of modern warfare 01:53:26 - Fourth Generation Warfare 01:56:49 - Final conclusions Become a member of this channel and get benefits: / @erick_40k

OUR SIDE OF THE STORY

GHOSTS OF THE TRENCHES: Martial Marching Dead

The Brazilian municipal spending spree

Why Does Fallout Look Like This After 200 Years?

O Dilema Do Anticristo Que Ninguém Está Discutindo...

Does Brazil have an elite that is not very interested in the country's development? | Breno Altma...

BRAZILIAN RETAIL IN DEEP CRISIS! CHILLI BEANS OWNER SPEAKS OUT!

LEGIÃO HEREGE: Mas que b**sta, hein, autor?!

Gothic 1: O BRUTAL RPG que REVOLUCIONOU o gênero

Skavens - Engenharia, Ego, Estupidez

HISTÓRIA COMPLETA DE WARHAMMER. Do velho mundo ao fim dos tempos. O Warhammer original.

Darkest Dungeon: Se o RH fosse gerido por Poe e o financeiro por Lovecraft

The Coming Storm: Worsening War in Greater Europe

The most bizarre conspiracy in Cyberpunk 2077

Which 1v1 Fight in Fiction is the BEST? (Analyzing with 5 Pillars)

The Road to Troy: Odysseus, Foolish Decisions, and Helen of Sparta

RUSSIA Built This and I don't KNOW WHY.

Brexit, 10 Years On: What It Actually Cost Britain

GTA 6: TUDO sobre o ÁPICE do JOGO *VICE CITY* Part 1

