QUEM TRABALHOU ANTES DE 1988: TEMA 1.387: DECISÃO DO STJ PODE ATINGIR MILHARES DE TRABALHADORES
WHO WORKED BEFORE 1988: TOPIC 1,387: STJ DECISION COULD AFFECT THOUSANDS OF WORKERS SEE THE DETAILS HERE: • QUEM TRABALHOU ANTES DE 1988: TEMA 1.387: ... This refers to Special Appeal No. 2,214,879/PE, judged by the First Section of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), under the rapporteurship of Minister Maria Thereza de Assis Moura, as representative of Topic 1,387. The controversy analyzed concerns the full withdrawal as the starting point for the statute of limitations for actions seeking compensation for failures in the provision of services related to individual PASEP accounts, including undue withdrawals, embezzlement, and lack of investment of income. The STJ decided that the full withdrawal of the principal is sufficient to start the ten-year statute of limitations for the participant to seek compensation for any differences or failures. The decision is based on the understanding that, upon making a full withdrawal, the participant becomes aware of the amount determined by Banco do Brasil as due, even without receiving detailed account statements. From that moment on, the participant has no expectation of receiving further amounts and must take the necessary steps to contest the balance if dissatisfied. The approved thesis was: “The full withdrawal of the principal initiates the statute of limitations for claims for compensation for failure to provide services, for improper withdrawals, for embezzlement, or for failure to apply the established income to an individual PASEP account.” In the specific case, the special appeal filed by a retiree was denied, upholding the decision that recognized the statute of limitations for the claim for compensation. 📢 Share this information with those who may need it! 📌SEE THE DETAILS ON THE BLOG: 💻vsprevidenciario.com ➡️Professor Valter dos Santos holds a postgraduate degree in Labor Law and Social Security Law. 📌TEMPLATES FOR DEFENSES AGAINST TRAFFIC FINES 👉 https://go.hotmart.com/A95163471I

PASEP: Has the game changed? STJ alters its understanding and puts lawsuits at risk (Topics 1300 ...

Por Que os Bancos ODEIAM Quem Tem R$ 25 Mil Investidos? (EU EXPLICO)

Trump's Plan to Destroy Social Security Revealed

The Man Who Worked At Subway, Then Solved An "Impossible" Problem

PASEP ➡️ Legitimidade e Prescrição ⚖️ STJ, Temas 545, 1150 e 1387

PASEP: SUMMARY OF TOPICS JUDGED BY THE STJ

Tema 1124 do STJ ⚠️ Interesse de agir e DIB em Previdenciário ➡️ RESUMO!

🇩🇪 QUEM TRABALHOU MENOS DE 5 ANOS NA ALEMANHA PODE SACAR TODA A APOSENTADORIA? | Advogada explica

Sentença Real: Banco do Brasil Condenado a Pagar R$ 128 Mil no Caso PASEP | Dr. Júlio Abeilard

Wise changed in May 2026 and some people are paying more without realizing it!

How the First R$100,000 Became 1 Million

Saques indevidos do PASEP - Ônus da prova | STJ, Tema 1300

Trump proíbe Claude Mythos, IA preocupa governo; Lula ignora perigo fiscal; Elon Musk trilionário

COURT DECISION FOR THOSE WHO WORKED BETWEEN 1971 AND 1999

PASEP: New Ruling at the Superior Court of Justice CHANGED EVERYTHING for Those Who Worked Betwee...

7 Bank Account Moves the IRS Is Flagging for Seniors (Most Don't Know)

Juros moratórios após expedição de precatório (período de graça). STF, Tema 1335 #enam

Banco do Brasil must respond to PASEP review action, TJPA decides based on STJ Theme 1150.

Putin's Army Is Running Out Of LOYALTY

