Análisis oración Subordinada Sustantiva con función de TÉRMINO dentro del complemento del adjetivo

In this video, we analyze in detail a sentence containing a Subordinate Noun Clause of TERM within a prepositional phrase that also performs the syntactic function of an Adjective Complement. This type of noun clause is the opposite of the noun clauses of an adjective complement, an adverb complement, etc., and why? Once again, we find that grammarians are not entirely in agreement. For example, in the sentence "It came out before the movie ended," while some grammarians consider "that the movie ended" to be a noun subordinate clause that complements the adverbial clause (before), including the preposition "of," other grammarians think that "that the movie ended" is a prepositional phrase that complements the adverbial clause, where "of" is the link and "that the movie ended" is the noun subordinate clause that complements the adverbial clause. We have explained the entire theory so far, following the first grammarians, who included the preposition "of" within the subordinate clause. However, according to the comments many of you have sent me, there is a certain tendency to opt for the "term" option, and it is not without good logic, as we will explain in the video. What will JAF Academy do from now on? To avoid misleading either of them, always explain both forms. Here's the link to a theoretical explanation of how to analyze this type of Subordinate Noun Clause, a Subordinate Clause with a Functional Complement of an Adverb, an Adjective, or a Noun, etc.    • Subordinadas sustantivas de TÉRMINO dentro...