💥 Daniel Sancho: ¿Faltó una metapericia? | Una forense responde

🔎 In this video, we analyze a fundamental question in the Daniel Sancho case: Did the defense truly have all the necessary elements to conduct a completely independent forensic analysis? Together with a forensic medicine professional, we address the difference between an expert opinion and a meta-expert opinion, and explain the limitations that can exist when experts do not have direct access to all available evidence. We also discuss the important contribution made by forensic pathologist Manuel Carrillo, who prepared a technical report based on the documentation he had access to. Our aim is not to question his work, but to understand what an expert opinion commissioned by the defense can contribute and how it differs from a broader forensic review of the evidence. Can a defense analyze a case with the same opportunities when certain evidence is no longer available? How important is the scientific review of expert reports in a homicide investigation? We discuss all of this in this interview, always with respect for the professionals involved, the presumption of innocence, and a rigorous analysis of the facts. 📌 At the end of the video, we've also included a clip of Manuel Carrillo answering journalists' questions about his analysis and conclusions. #DanielSancho #viralvideo #ForensicMedicine #Metaexpertise #Expertise #rodolfosancho #justice #Criminology #ForensicInvestigation #scientificinvestigation #sanchocases