Antigravity vs Claude Code: Testei os DOIS e Um Humilhou o Outro

In this video, I put Antigravity and Claude Code head-to-head in a real-world test to find out which is the best vibe coding tool in 2025. The challenge is to create the exact same project from scratch with both tools using the same prompt, character by character, and compare the results across 7 objective criteria. ❇️ Secure your discount on the Vibe Coding Training: https://app.horadecodar.com.br/lp/esq... 🟪 Hosting for n8n that I recommend: https://hostinger.com.br/matheusbattisti (use coupon HORADECODAR for an additional 10% discount) 📘 Prompt Engineering Guide: https://app.horadecodar.com.br/ebookp... The chosen project is FlowBoard, a complete Trello clone with a Kanban board, drag-and-drop between columns, cards with priority, assignees and due dates, editing modal with checklist, sidebar with multiple boards, real-time search, filters, and dark mode. I chose this project because it tests everything at once: heavy state management, complex UI interactions with drag-and-drop, beautiful design without visual references, and mobile responsiveness. If the tool can deliver this, it can deliver anything. The stack used is Next.js with TypeScript and Tailwind CSS, which is the most popular modern stack for web projects. The data is mocked in Portuguese to focus on the frontend and state management. The video works in rounds. In the first round, I send the main prompt asking for the complete Kanban board with 17 features at once. This is where the details are separated. Then I progressively add features: a comment system within the cards with the author's avatar and relative time, a complete calendar view with navigation between months and dragging cards between dates, visual improvements such as confetti animation when a card is moved to the completed column and cards pulsing in red when the deadline is due. In the final round, I ask for a complete authentication system with login screen, registration, field validation, route protection, and logout. The 7 criteria I analyze are: speed from the first prompt to the project running, fidelity to the prompt with a checklist of 17 items verified live, design quality in the first delivery without any adjustments, number of bugs and errors that appeared, autonomy measured by the number of extra prompts each tool needed to function, mobile responsiveness tested live in DevTools, and extras that the tool delivered beyond what was requested, such as animations and bonus features. Antigravity is Google's coding vibe IDE that has gained a lot of traction recently with its visual approach and integrated interface. Claude Code is Anthropic's coding agent that runs directly in the terminal and stands out for its autonomy and code quality. The two tools have very different philosophies, and this comparison shows in practice which one delivers more. If you are deciding which tool to use for your projects, this video will give you the definitive answer with real data, not opinion. Watch until the end to see the result. Join our Discord server and follow me on social media: 🟣 Discord Hora de Codar:   / discord   🔴 Instagram:   / horadecodar   🔷 Telegram: https://t.me/horadecodar TIMESTAMPS 00:00 About Claude Code vs Antigravity 01:15 Starting the project 05:40 Analyzing the creation process of Claude Code and Antigravity 10:50 Testing the initial version of the created projects 12:55 Adding new functionality to Claude Code and Antigravity 15:00 Testing the new added feature 15:55 Fixing a bug with Claude Code 18:13 Design improvements in Antigravity and Claude Code 20:44 Checking the design improvements 25:23 Implementing authentication with Claude Code and Antigravity (login and (Record) 27:28 Testing authentication 30:34 My thoughts on which is better: Claude Code or Antigravity