Yaşar Nuri Öztürk: Mezhepler Din Değildir... Kuran' Göre Mezhepler...

In this video, Prof. Dr. Yaşar Nuri Öztürk explains his approach to the issue of sects in Islam and his Quran-centered understanding of religion in a simple and understandable language. According to Yaşar Nuri Öztürk, sects are not religion itself, but human interpretations that have emerged within historical circumstances. He believes that the true source of Islam is the Quran, and the fundamental measure of religion should be the principles directly laid down by the Quran. Within this framework, Öztürk emphasizes that it is incorrect for Muslims to view sects as a "superior authority." He specifically states that sects are accumulations of thought that can help in understanding religion; however, they cannot replace the source of faith and religion. The video also seeks answers to the following questions from a Quranic perspective: How did sects emerge? Are sects a part of religion, or are they historical interpretations? How does the Quran view sectarianism? What is the essential source that is binding for Muslims? According to Yaşar Nuri Öztürk, the Quran, in the realm of belief and religion, does not prioritize division and grouping, but rather a shared consciousness and understanding of moral responsibility centered on revelation. Therefore, individual responsibility based on the Quran should be prioritized, not "sectarian" identity. 🇬🇧 English In this video, Yaşar Nuri Öztürk's views on Islamic sects (madhhabs) and the issue of sects from a Quran-centered perspective are discussed in a clear and accessible way. According to Yaşar Nuri Öztürk, sects are not the religion itself, but rather human interpretations that emerged under historical and social conditions. In his view, the true and primary source of Islam is the Quran, and the fundamental criterion for religious understanding must be the principles established directly by the Quran. He emphasizes that treating sects as a kind of supreme religious authority is a serious mistake. Sects may serve as intellectual and historical references, but they can never replace the Qur'an as the source of faith and religion. The video addresses the following questions from a Qur'anic perspective: How did Islamic sects emerge? What is the true binding source for a Muslim? According to Yaşar Nuri Öztürk, the Qur'an does not promote division or group-based identities in matters of faith. Instead, it calls for a shared consciousness and moral responsibility based on divine revelation. Therefore, what truly matters is not belonging to a sect, but personal responsibility is grounded in the Qur'an. This video offers a clear and thoughtful perspective on the questions “Are sects part of religion?” oath “What is the place of sects according to the Qur'an?” through the intellectual approach of Yaşar Nuri Öztürk. 🇸🇦 العربية في هذا الفيديو يتم تناول موقف ياشار نوري أوزتورك من المذاهب في The best way to do this واضح ومبسّط. يرى ياشار نوري أوزتورك أن المذاهب ليست هي الدين نفسه، وإنما هي اجتهادات بشرية نشأت في ظروف تاريخية واجتماعية معيّنة. ويؤكد أن المصدر الأساسي والوحيد للدين هو القرآن، وأن الميزان الحقيقي لفهم الإسلام يجب أن يكون مستندًا مباشرة إلى مبادئ القرآن. ويشدّد على أن تحويل المذاهب إلى مرجعية دينية عليا يُعدّ خطأً كبيرًا. فالمذاهب قد تفيد في الفهم والتأمل التاريخي، لكنها لا يمكن أن تكون بديلاً عن القرآن ولا مصدرًا للإيمان. In this article: I'm sorry This is a good thing. كيف ينظر القرآن إلى التفرّق المذهبي؟ ما هو المصدر الملزم الحقيقي للمسلم؟ وبحسب ياشار نوري أوزتورك، فإن القرآن لا يدعو إلى التفرّق ولا إلى الهويات المذهبية، بل يدعو إلى وعي مشترك ومسؤولية أخلاقية قائمة على الوحي. ولذلك فإن الأساس ليس الانتماء إلى مذهب، بل تحمّل المسؤولية الفردية على ضوء القرآن. In this article: «هل المذاهب دين؟» و«ما مكانة المذاهب في ضوء القرآن؟» من خلال فكر ياشار نوري أوزتورك. 🇷🇺 Русский In this video, you can watch the video below. исламские мазхабы (религиозные школы) and theme зрения Корана, в ясной и досstupной форме. Next to Yasara Nuris, мазхабы — это не сама религия, а человеческие interretaции, возникшие в определённых исторических условиях. Он подчёркивает, что главным и подлинным источником ислама является Коран, и именно его принципы должны быть основным orientirom в религиозном понимании. In this case, there is a religiosity. autoritetom — ошибочно. Мазхабы могут быть полезны как intellectual историческое наследие, однако они не могут заменить Коран и не могут быть источником веры. В video recording video вопросы: How many islamic products? Являются ли мазхабы частью религии или это исторические толкования? Как Коран относится к религиозным разделенияam? Каков по-настоящему обязательный источник для мусульманина? С точки зрения Яшара Нури Озтюрка, Коран не поощряет разделение и групповые религиозные идентичности, а призывает к единому the meaning of the word otkrovenii. в рамках подхода Яшара Нури Озтюрка.