ASICS Superblast 3: la regina delle super trainer? FF LEAP, 239 g e stack da 46,5 mm

Calling the ASICS Superblast 3 a simple super trainer is almost an understatement. This shoe features the new FF LEAP foam, the same technology family used on the Metaspeed Tokyo racing shoes, a 46.5 mm ground clearance, no carbon plate, and a weight claimed by ASICS of just 239 grams. ⏱️BUY SUPERBLAST 3⏱️ ► Top4running: https://bit.ly/42wDvZe (5% discount code: MASSIMILANI) ► Cisalfa: https://tidd.ly/3QWWgCL ► Maxisport: https://tidd.ly/3QKuCVU ⏱️BUY SUPERBLAST 2⏱️ ► Cisalfa: https://tidd.ly/3F7XC7L ► Top4running: https://bit.ly/41vEFmO (5% discount code: MASSIMILANI) ► Maxisport: https://tidd.ly/3QKuCVU ASICS provided them to me for this review, and I ran over 120 km with them, plus another 22 km. Made by my son Matteo. In the next few minutes, I'll tell you about the ten things I liked, the two I would have changed, and, most importantly, who I truly recommend this shoe to. Let's start with the specs. In size US 9, it weighs 239 grams, has an 8 mm drop, and a huge, but very well-managed, stack. Compared to the Superblast 2, ASICS has shaved about 13 grams, mostly thanks to the new, less dense foam. The interesting thing is that this isn't a racing shoe: it's a premium trainer for training hard, long, and often. The heart of the Superblast 3 is the midsole. Up top, we find FF LEAP, a soft, lightweight, and very responsive foam; underneath, we find FF BLAST PLUS, which is more structured, more stable, and useful for providing control. It's a sandwich construction: on top, you have rebound and comfort; below, you have support and mechanical continuity. There's no carbon, and that's a deliberate choice. The propulsion doesn't come from a plate, but from the geometry, the amount of foam, and the quality of the compound. Compared to the previous model, the Superblast 3 is softer, more fluid, and slightly less stiff. In my tests, I also noticed a 2-3% reduction in ground contact time, depending on the pace. It's not just a feeling: the shoe actually seems to work better when you start running continuously. The upper has been improved. ASICS uses an engineered woven mesh, a woven structure with variable density zones: more breathable where needed, more supportive where the foot needs to stay still. Compared to the previous version, the forefoot is more welcoming. I recommend the same size, because the length is still correct, but the space at the front is more generous. The lacing system is also good. The laces are semi-elastic, the right length, and the slightly asymmetrical eyelets help secure the midfoot without compressing the instep. The tongue is thin, racing-style, perforated at the top, and gusseted: it stays put, doesn't shift, and allows you to tighten the shoe without discomfort. The heel is very solid. The heel cup is rigid, as it should be on such a high-cut shoe, but the collar isn't oppressive. The Achilles tendon is well protected, and the foot locks in place excellently. Stability comes from three elements: a wide base, torsional rigidity, and a well-constructed rearfoot structure. But be warned: this is not a shoe for severe overpronators, as there's no real medial support. The outsole uses the classic ASICS AHAR/ASICSGRIP rubber in the most exposed areas. Coverage isn't complete, but after over 140 km overall, we haven't seen any serious wear issues. Traction is good on asphalt and even on hard-packed dirt tracks. When changing direction, however, the high stack is noticeable: this isn't a shoe for nervous 5 km runs or sharp turns. Who do I recommend it for? Intermediate or advanced runners who run 60 to 150 km per week, even with a medium-heavy weight, and are looking for a premium shoe for slow, long, progressive, and medium runs. As for pace, I see it as perfect from 6:00/km to 3:45/km. Below 3:45/km, it might feel a bit too soft, but it depends a lot on your running style. For distances, it's a mileage machine: from 10 km to the marathon, and beyond. For me, it's ideal for long runs, training marathons, and quality daily runs. It's not World Athletics-approved for elite road races because it exceeds 40 mm of stack height, but for the amateur runner, it remains one of the most complete shoes of 2026. The two flaws? First: the tread could last less than the previous model. Second: it's a bulky shoe, not suitable for short races with lots of changes in pace and direction. But ASICS did exactly what it was supposed to do: they made the Superblast lighter, softer, more modern, and more fun. The real question is: are we willing to spend so much when there are cheaper shoes like the Novablast 5? If you're on a budget and want a premium super trainer, I think the Superblast 3 is one of the best shoes of the year. Stay strong and keep running. #ASICSsuperblast3 #RunningShoes #massimilani