Seedance 2.0, Kling 3.0, Veo 3.1? Character Consistency Test + Free Prompts

Runway AI & Seedance 2.0. Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 vs Veo 3.1 — I tested all three AI video generators on the same character, same prompts, same workflow. Which AI kept the face? Which one lost it completely? Here are the results. In this video I run a full character consistency test across Seedance 2.0, Kling 3.0, and Veo 3.1. I score each model on motion quality, prompt adherence, visual quality, and character consistency — so you know exactly which AI video generator to use and why. 🛠️ TOOLS USED • Runway AI → Video and Image Generation https://runwayml.com/ • Try ElevenLabs for Free 👉 - https://try.elevenlabs.io/a0m01wk8803p 🔥 Get the FREE Prompts used in this video: ►CHARACTER CONTACT SHEET PROMPT: https://1drv.ms/b/c/e7924dde3cffb944/... ►Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 vs Google Veo 3.1 – Test Prompts: https://1drv.ms/b/c/e7924dde3cffb944/... ►Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 vs Veo 3.1 Consistency Test Prompts: https://1drv.ms/b/c/e7924dde3cffb944/... 🎬 TIMESTAMPS 00:00 – AI Video Intro 00:46 – The character and contact sheet 01:48 – Runway AI Unlimited – what you need to know 03:25 – Character Consistency test begins 03:42 – Results: Seedance 2.0 04:18 – Results: Kling 3.0 05:03 – Results: Veo 3.1 05:47 – Same prompt, different AI model (no character) 08:38 – Final verdict & recommendation #AIVideo #CharacterConsistency #Seedance #KlingAI #Veo31 #RunwayAI #AIFilmmaking #TextToVideo #AITools #AIVideoGeneration *Some links in this description may be affiliate links. I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. SUBSCRIBE - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6ux... This video is not sponsored by any company or organization. All opinions, reviews, and recommendations expressed in this video are my own personal views, based on my experience and independent testing of the tools and platforms shown. All logos, trademarks, and product names appearing in this video are the property of their respective owners and are used here for educational and illustrative purposes only.