Karen Read RESPONDS to Judge Gildea

Join this channel to get access to perks:    / @formanlaw   In this video, I go through Karen Read’s response to Judge Gildea’s request for clarification in the O’Keefe civil case. Karen’s team responds to the court about the language used in their opposition to Brian Tully’s motion to quash, including the phrases “apparently” and “it appears.” But the real story is the timeline they lay out: multiple subpoenaed witnesses allegedly resisting depositions, objecting late, claiming they were unavailable, or not showing up. Was Judge Gildea offended by the wording, or was he asking Karen’s team to put the full record in writing? Let’s break down the filing, the timeline, and what this could mean next. Get your Merch Here: https://the-dui-guys-store.creator-sp... Need an attorney? Call 502-931-6788 or email [email protected] OR Schedule an appointment: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman Let's work together to solve your problem! Connect With Attorney Larry Forman: Website: www.larryformanlaw.com X: https://x.com/FormanLaw1 TikTok:   / formanlaw1   Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/033uVqe... Facebook:   / formanlaw1   Instagram:   / formanlaw   LinkedIn:   / formanlaw   Locals: https://theduiguyplus.locals.com/ CashApp: http://cash.app/LarryForman #BuckleUp #ItsTheLaw #FreeKarenRead