La Russa: "Se incidente si recupera al Senato, senno riflessione va fatta"

La Russa: "If an accident occurs, it will be resolved in the Senate; otherwise, we need to reflect." "It wasn't a vote of confidence or the final vote on a bill." Politics (Rome). "I believe the Prime Minister has the situation absolutely under control." This was Senate President Ignazio La Russa's comment in Montecitorio on the Chamber of Deputies' vote on the amendment, which split the majority. "The thing I can recall is that we are in a bicameral system: whatever the reasons that led to this vote, the Senate has the ability to correct or overturn the Chamber's result. If it was an accident due to absences or other reasons, it's easy to resolve it in the Senate. If, however, the reasons were different, then Meloni is right, and a moment of serious reflection begins." Regarding potential snipers, La Russa observes: "In these cases, it's obvious that they could exist. This is precisely why Meloni had asked for the secret ballot to be abandoned, so that everyone could put their own face forward. Some didn't submit amendments, and others did, hiding behind the secret ballot. The rules were respected, and there's nothing to say about the vote in the Chamber." The Senate President then emphasizes that any political consideration "is up to the government," noting that in the Senate "a secret ballot is not permitted on this point" and that it will therefore be possible to intervene on the text. When asked about the majority's stability after the vote, La Russa downplays it: "It wasn't a vote of confidence, nor the final vote on a law. There are dozens of cases where the majority has submitted amendments that have followed similar paths." (Stefano Chianese/alanews) Automatically generated transcript Start a reflection: the majority after the vote, what do you think? Whoever said it afterward is under control. The only thing I can remember is that we are in a bicameral system, and whatever the reasons led you to this way, for example, I'll say the most banal: a center-right vice president presided. It would have been enough for a center-left president to be president. The President of the Chamber of Deputies, when it comes to absences, is the one I remember. I remember that in a bicameral system, the Chamber, in this case, the Senate has the ability to correct or change the result of the first chamber, which led, in this case, to the Chamber of Deputies. So if it was an accident due to absence for something like that, it's easy to recover in the Senate, that is, for reasons perhaps of shit. You're right, Meloni. That's precisely why Meloni had asked everyone to give up asking for a secret ballot so that everyone can put their face to it. There are those who haven't even submitted an amendment, there are those who have submitted one, and there are, so I believe that it's a lot that has respected the rules, so not There is nothing to say about the vote in the Chamber. There is a political reflection that the government believes should be opened. There is a more banal possibility in the Senate to correct or change the point without a vote. If I remember correctly, I am all. I think I remember well to change what the other chamber was not the vote on confidence. It was not the final vote of a light photo on an amendment. There are dozens of cases mentally away from May.