10 Dumb Darts Players That Went Broke Because of This...

These are ten professional darts players whose careers ended in bankruptcy, prison, long bans, rock-bottom poverty, or a public admission of financial trouble big enough to get them banned from running a company. The taxman finished some of them. Drink and drugs took others. A handful destroyed themselves with a single decision that could not be undone. One world champion drained rusty water from a radiator to make a Pot Noodle alone in a Wigan hotel room. Another was delivering two hundred Amazon parcels a day for twelve pounds a shift during COVID. A third died on disability benefits in a council flat, seventeen years after beating Eric Bristow in a world final watched by eight million people. One pleaded guilty in a courtroom and every career revenue stream closed the same afternoon. And the player at number one earned over two million pounds in prize money and did not understand that prize money is taxed — until HMRC sent a bill for five hundred thousand pounds there was nothing left to pay it with. His own words: "I hid my head in the sand." RIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognize a "fair use" of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." This video and our YouTube channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above. Fair Dealing: Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 (UK) section 30 states "Fair dealing" with a work for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another work, does not infringe any copyright in the work provided that it is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. Copyright in a work is not infringed by the use of a quotation from the work (whether for criticism or review or otherwise).----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contact: [email protected]