He Blew 0.00 — Cop Said 'Good To Go' Then ARRESTED Him For DUI (Lawyer Explains)

I'm Dan Marshall. In this one we break down what happened to Nathan Stephens — a sober driver handcuffed and hauled to jail for DUI after he blew a 0.00 and passed every field sobriety test on camera. What the officer did, what the law actually says about probable cause, field sobriety tests, and qualified immunity, and whether any of it was legal. Comply physically, assert your rights verbally. (Educational only — not legal advice.) The one line that protects you: "I'm not answering any questions without my lawyer." The stated reason he went to jail? DUI — after a breath test that read 0.00. The officer even told him "you're good to go," then arrested him ninety seconds later. Watch it from the beginning and ask yourself: at what point did Nathan Stephens do anything wrong? ⏱ Timestamps 0:00 He blew 0.00 — and went to jail anyway 1:23 Nathan Stephens: the man who got hit 2:47 What an arrest for DUI actually requires 3:24 The breath test reads 0.00 5:16 "If you're not impaired, you'll be fine" 8:05 He passes every field sobriety test 11:09 "That's qualified immunity. I wouldn't get sued" 12:39 "You're good to go" 13:42 90 seconds later — the arrest 15:50 "What did I blow on the test?" 18:05 Dismissed — and what it's worth 18:48 The cop wasn't fired. He got rehired. 19:04 Three things every driver should know 🔑 Know your rights: blew 0.00, sober DUI arrest, field sobriety test, horizontal gaze nystagmus, probable cause, no probable cause, 4th Amendment, qualified immunity, wrongful arrest, false arrest, DUI dismissed, Grayson Kentucky Police, Officer Bell, Nathan Stephens. Subscribe before your next stop — know your rights before you need them. Footage: public-record body-worn camera (via The Civil Rights Lawyer / John H. Bryan). Case facts: court records (Carter County), Paintsville Herald, KRS 189A.010. #KnowYourRights #Bodycam #LawyerReacts