"Ramaphosa won't face harm": William Mokhare SC for Impeachment Committee

Advocate William Mokhare SC appears on behalf of the Chairperson of the Impeachment Committee in President Ramaphosa's application for an interim interdict to halt the Section 89 impeachment process pending his review of the Independent Panel Report. This is the full argument delivered before the Western Cape High Court in Cape Town. Bench of judges: Le Grange J (Presiding) Francis J Davis J Watch the full case:    • Phala Phala Interdict Case   Become a YouTube Member of SMWX:    / @_smwx   Visit the SMWX store for merch and books: https://smwx.store CONTACT: ✉️: [email protected] Visit our website: smwx.africa _______ Credits: Director and DOP: Nomaan Haarzavi for Narr8 Studio Lead Camera Operator: Faizan Haq for Narr8 Studio 2nd Camera Operator: Yusuf Rahman for Narr8 Studio Producer: Oratile Kekana 00:00 The Committee's Constitutional Duty & Neutral Role 08:17 Reading the Constitutional Court Judgment as a Whole 10:23 The Section 89 Process is One Continuous Constitutional Process 13:30 The Independent Panel's Limited Function 18:00 Why the Constitutional Court Intended the Process to Continue 22:15 Why the Process Cannot Be Halted Midway 27:27 Interpreting Paragraph 139 ("Unless and Until Reviewed") 32:03 The Distinct Role of the Impeachment Committee 35:00 Review Before vs Review After the Constitutional Court Order 39:22 The President Missed the Opportunity to Challenge the Report 40:09 The Constitutional Court's Referral Order Must Be Obeyed 45:16 Constitutional Accountability Cannot Be Delayed 49:43 "Sufficient Evidence" and "Prima Facie" Mean the Same Thing Here 53:24 Amendment to the Notice of Motion & Costs