জমির দলিল আছে, রেকর্ড আছে কিন্তু দখল নাই কিভাবে জমির দখল পাবেন? দলিল।। রেকর্ড।। খতিয়ান।। দখল।।

Dear viewers, in this episode, I have discussed how to get possession of land if there is land document, record, or no possession? 3. Criminal Court: File a case under Section 144 and 145 of the First Class Executive Magistrate's Court for dispossession. See the legal remedy part. 4. Civil Court: File a case in a court with jurisdiction. See the legal remedy part. Trying to take possession of land through the police station or an influential person by using influence. An end to a misconception. Many people think that since I have documents, there is a ledger, so what is the problem if I take possession of my land. That is, the land that he tries to take possession of by force on paper. He thinks that if I try to take possession of the land, if an adverse situation or riot arises, I will show my documents. So justice will come in my favor because if I do not take possession of my land, who will? This is a misconception. If you do this, firstly, people from some side may be injured or even killed, or there may be damage or looting. In a situation where new criminal cases may arise. Both parties will be harmed. Even instead of getting the land back, the real owner of the land may have to go to jail as a defendant in a criminal case. Then it will seem, I am the one in jail for my land? In fact, due to ignorance of the law, people have to go to jail even though they are entitled to the land. Secondly, if someone tries to seize the land that is his on paper, then the law would deteriorate greatly. Because anyone influential would start seizing someone else's land and say that the land is mine on paper, but later it turns out that there are mistakes in his papers. Therefore, even if the land is the real owner, the law does not support the attempt to seize it. If it did, numerous murders and destruction would increase in the attempt to seize it. To maintain law and order, the law initially keeps the person in possession in possession, even though he is not the real owner of the land, until the civil court makes a decision or decree regarding the ownership of the land. Therefore, the real owner of the land should file a case in the civil court to get the possession back. This is his legal remedy. Now let's see what protection the law provides in case of dispossession from land? Discussion according to the limitation period. 1. Remedy within 2 months of dispossession: This is the only criminal remedy. It is the most effective, immediate remedy. The decision of the case is taken quickly. There is no delay like in a civil case. The Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 145 says that within 2 months of dispossession from land, This case is filed with the Executive Magistrate of the First Class. In this case, Section 144 of the same Act can also be attached. After filing a complaint in the said court under Section 145, he will give a notice to the accused party if he takes cognizance of the complaint. The notice will mention the place and date and ask him to appear and present his statement. Apart from this, he can order the police to investigate the dispossession. This is a criminal remedy by an Executive Magistrate. The principle of "He who is in possession remains in possession" is followed. That is, in this court, the actual ownership of the land is not verified. Only who was in peaceful possession is investigated. Therefore, even if the peaceful possessor is not the actual owner of the land, he will get this remedy, that is, he will get possession back. In this case, the remedy of the actual owner is to file a case in the civil court. And if the actual owner is dispossessed by someone else, he will also get this remedy. The cost of the case in this is much less than in a civil case and is time-saving. 2. Remedy within 6 months of dispossession: This step can be taken if 2 months have passed since the dispossession. However, this step must be taken within 6 months. This is a civil remedy. This remedy is provided according to Section 9 of the Specific Remedies Act. For this, a case for eviction of possession has to be filed in the civil court. In this case, the ownership is not verified like in Section 145. Only the actual possession is proven. Therefore, the evidence regarding ownership does not carry much importance in this case. The person who can prove that he was in peaceful possession, and the other party illegally encroached and dispossessed him. The court will take necessary measures to get back possession. The cost of this case is less than that of the civil court, that is, half of the ad-hoc court fee on the value of the case. If the real owner is deprived of his land rights in this case, what he can do is to file a case under Section 8 and Section 42 of the Specific Remedies Act. 3. Remedy within 12 years of dispossession: This is a final stage civil remedy. Although it is the most reliable, long-lasting, the length of the case and the court fee are a little higher. A case is filed to recover dec...