ANU legal scholars re-enact Hart-Fuller debate
In 1957, the most influential legal philosopher of the 20th century gave a lecture at Harvard Law School. H.L.A. Hart (1907-92) had been invited to speak there by Lon L. Fuller (1902-78), himself a renowned philosopher of law. So enraged was Fuller by Hart’s approach to law and justice, that he took it upon himself to answer Hart’s argument in detail. The two positions were published in a now legendary exchange in the pages of the Harvard Law Review the following year. They offer diametrically opposed positions on key questions in thinking about law: what is the relationship between law and morality? What does it mean to interpret a legal provision? To what extent are lawyers and legal systems bound to follow the regulations of pernicious or even evil regimes? In what ways are law and justice connected, and in what ways are they different? The debate between Hart and Fuller has been central to how students of law have thought about these vital questions for over sixty years. But although the essays they published really are a debate – an almost point by point repudiation of each other’s views – it can be hard to appreciate how vigorous and forthright and compelling it was. So, in a dramatic innovation, this video "stages" the Hart-Fuller debate exactly as a debate — as if it were an episode of a telvisedinterview. ANU College of Law scholars Professor Desmond Manderson FASSA, FAAL, FRSC and Associate Professor Joshua Neoh, representing Fuller and Hart respectively, set out their disagreements, using only the words written by the two great legal thinkers; and then answer questions from the live studio audience. For the first time, the cut and thrust of the Hart-Fuller Debate can be fully appreciated. For the first time, these remarkable essays come to life, turning dry words into insight, passion and even wit. It’s the Hart-Fuller Debate, Jim, but not as we know it! ****** Follow us ****** Facebook: facebook.com/anucollegeoflaw/ Instagram: instagram.com/anucollegeoflaw/ Twitter: twitter.com/ANU_Law Web: law.anu.edu.au/ ****** Study with us ****** law.anu.edu.au/study/study-programs

How to fight populism? Michael Sandel on renewing the dignity of work

Lawyers are to blame for climate change: Yeah, nah, yeah?

Phillipa Weeks Lecture 2023: Collective Bargaining in Franchise Networks

The Genocide Convention and the ICJ: Further developments

The Hart-Fuller Debates on Morality and Law

Trump Preps for 80th Birthday, Threatens to Hit Iran, Knicks Historic Win & Elon Musk Trillionaire!?

Conan O’Brien Delivers the Commencement Address | Harvard Commencement 2026

Mexiko – Südafrika Highlights | Gruppe A, FIFA WM 2026 | sportstudio

Ronald Dworkin's attack on HLA Hart's Theory of Law

The curse of the sausage: laws, expectation and complexity in modern elections

Thinking hard about lawyers, corporations and the environment

“Listen Like You Might Be Wrong” | Harvard Student’s Viral Speech Amid Trump-Harvard Feud

Love, sex, and happiness, explained by philosophy | Jonny Thomson: Full Interview

Philosopher Michael Sandel | Who Merits to Govern Us? – Lecture

2024 Phillipa Weeks Lecture: The de-collectivisation of representation in collective bargaining

How the World Misunderstands America

The Hart vs. Devlin Encore Debate

The Hart-Fuller Debates on Morality and Law

Is There Truth in Interpretation? Law, Literature and History

