THIS Is Scientific Evidence for God!

Does science disprove God—or point to Him? Let’s closely examine the Big Bang, DNA, and modern physics to find out. Watch and consider the evidence for yourself. You just might find God’s fingerprints all around you. In this fascinating exploration of science and Scripture, we examine: ✔ The origin of the universe ✔ The fine-tuning of physical laws ✔ The astonishing complexity of living cells ✔ The information encoded in DNA ✔ Why many scientists struggle with the implications of the evidence Ready to get closer to your Creator? Watch next    • Praying Doesn’t Have to Be Complicated (Ma...   For more evidence for God’s creation, order our FREE study guide, “The Real God: Proofs and Promises.” https://bit.ly/3Qb22k2 Why is it free? We are determined to follow Jesus’ command to “freely give” (Matthew 10:8). Browse our full library of resources at https://www.tomorrowsworld.org | Learn more about our church, the Living Church of God, at https://www.lcg.org View our full sermon library ‪@mylcgtv‬ 00:00 God’s Creation: Evidence for God 02:36 The Heavens Declare God’s Glory | Psalm 19 1 03:22 Big Bang Theory: A Beginning Requires a Cause 06:44 Scientific Proof of God | Laws of the Universe 10:33 Bible Verses About Creation and the Lawgiver 11:57 Cells and DNA Carry Information Beyond Chance 17:38 God Created You for a Purpose #godscreation #intelligentdesign #godisreal Too many physicists, cosmologists, and biologists refuse to see the evidence before their eyes—refuse to acknowledge the fingerprints of God that exist all over the very subjects they study. They proclaim a dedication to following the evidence, but when the evidence points in a direction they find undesirable—they look away. God’s fingerprints are numerous throughout His creation. The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament shows His handiwork (Psalm 19 1). King David looked on the cosmos around us and saw God’s fingerprints there. He recognized the truth revealed in the very first verse of the Bible. In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth (Genesis 1 1). So without a telescope or spectral analysis or cosmic microwave measurements, David could still look at the universe above his head and conclude: This is a fingerprint of God who created all of this. And science has backed the Bible up—as the evidence does point to a universe that did not always exist. There really was a “beginning” to everything. Today, the Big Bang theory is taken so much for granted that many do not realize that when evidence for it was first discovered, scientists vigorously opposed it because it sounded too much like Genesis’s description of God’s creation in the book of Genesis. For instance, when Georges Lemaître first suggested that relativity implied that the universe began at a certain point in time, Albert Einstein told him that “it suggests too much the (theological) idea of creation.” Writing in the esteemed science journal Nature, astrophysicist Sir Arthur Eddington said of the idea: Philosophically, the notion of a beginning of the present order of Nature is repugnant to me (Vol. 127 (1931), p. 450). And astronomer and cosmologist Fred Hoyle mocked the idea of a beginning to the universe, saying that the idea of a “big bang” was “a form of religious fundamentalism.” In fact, he coined the term “big bang” to ridicule the idea, saying that: The reason why scientists like the “big bang” is because they are overshadowed by the Book of Genesis (“The End of the World: from the Standpoint of Mathematical Physics,” vol. 127 (1931), pp. 447–453). Why they were all unnerved is perhaps best summed in a statement by famous physicist Stephen Hawking. As New Scientist magazine reported in 2012, he noted: A point of creation would be a place where science broke down. One would have to appeal to religion and the hand of God (“Why Physicists Can’t Avoid a Creation Event,” New Scientist Magazine, January 11, 2012). The scientists who rejected a beginning of the universe because it sounded too much like the Bible were wrong, and a universe that came into existence at some point in time is now considered the reigning theory in cosmology. As prominent physicist Alexander Vilenkin wrote in 2007: “With the proof now in place, cosmologists can no longer hide behind the possibility of a past-eternal universe. There is no escape, they have to face the problem of a cosmic beginning” (Many Worlds in One, 2007, p. 176). Why would so many scientists consider that a problem? Well, think about it: If the universe had a beginning, then what caused that beginning? After all, science is very much the study of cause and effect. If the universe itself is the effect, then what was the cause? It would have to be beyond matter, beyond energy, beyond space, and beyond time. So if all that is natural had a beginning, then it points to a SUPERNATURAL cause. The beginning of the universe is one massive fingerprint that points to God. But we can go further.