Response to Craig Truglia's "Ambrose Ends Chalcedon Debate!"
In this video, Agen and iKan refute Craig Truglia’s claims about St. Ambrose’s Christology. Far from being aligned with later Chalcedonian definitions, Ambrose’s teaching, as it was upheld at the Council of Ephesus, reflects the miaphysite understanding of Christ—one incarnate nature of God the Word. This video carefully exposes the flaws in Truglia’s interpretations by showing how the genuine faith of the Fathers stands against later distortions.

▶︎
Ambrose Ends Chalcedon Debate!

▶︎
Debate: Was Chalcedon Cyrillian? Truglia VS Kakish/Agen

▶︎
Correcting the Experts on Servetus

▶︎
Miaphysitism in Scripture (ft. Dcn. Mihret & SubDcn. Daniel)

▶︎
Responding to Mount Athos: On the Eastern–Oriental Orthodox Joint Statement

▶︎
St. Gregory of Nyssa REFUTED This Argument Against the Trinity

▶︎
The Catholic Magisterium Is a LOT Like the Sanhedrin: The Mark Series pt 44 (11:27-33)

▶︎
The Christological Controversy — The Road to Chalcedon with @danielkakish

▶︎
'Orthodox' Archmandrite LIES About Oriental Orthodoxy (Reaction & Response to Fr. Maximos)

▶︎
The Most Controversial Teaching of Christ & Ancient Heresies@Apostolic Orthodoxy @Western Diocese

▶︎
The Church Fathers taught Miaphysitism

▶︎
Orthodox Christian REFUTES Chalcedonian Heretics (Agen vs. SIIIG + Kata + Wayne + Abdul)

▶︎
What is SonarQube | Introduction SonarQube | SonarQube Tutorial | SonarQube Basics | Intellipaat

▶︎
Refuting “The Church Fathers Do NOT Teach One Nature”

▶︎
Inconvenient Chalcedon: Eastern versus Oriental Orthodox Interpretations

▶︎
The Council of Chalcedon and its Aftermath: An Oriental Orthodox Perspective with @danielkakish

▶︎
Filioque Debate David Erhan Vs. Scholastic Answers

▶︎
If Jesus Is God, Why Didn’t He Know Everything?: The Mark Series pt 56 (13:32-37)

▶︎
Protestant vs. Orthodox: Scripture and Tradition (Gavin Ortlund + Stephen De Young)

▶︎
